UPDATE 1 Jan: Summary + full decision published! 6 years after a complaint, the DPC finds LinkedIn breached lawfulness (no consent, legitimate interest or contractual necessity), fairness, and transparency. Result: reprimand, order to rectify violations + €310 million fine.
A ruling that sparks questions around 'strictly necessary' and 'purpose'. Facebook can't indiscriminately use personal data on or off their platform for personalised ads, without restricting the duration and type of data.
Latest: Meta reduces sub prices and offers new free choice with less personalised ads, claiming it "goes beyond what is required in the law". 💸 And gets huge fines: €797.72m from the 🇪🇺 EC for antitrust violations and $25.4m from 🇮🇳 India's competition authority for 2021 privacy notice failures.
The 'Bundeskartellamt' ruling, where the CJEU applies 'strictly' to the legal bases necessity test for the first time. 🔥 You might rely on legitimate interest for direct marketing, network security or product improvement, but the processing must now meet this higher threshold.
The Oslo District Court ruled in favour of the state on all points, after Grindr sued the authorities after the Privacy Appeals Board fully upheld the DPA's decision, including the NOK 65m record fine. Preliminary win, but expect an appeal.
[Updated 24 April with highlighted file + 🎙️] Is the EDPB trying to "rewrite the entire economic model of Big Tech and the adtech industry in the EU"? 🤔 Controversial Opinion just published!
⏰ Datatilsynet will soon start investigating non-compliant tracking technologies. If you use Meta Pixel or similar, it's time for website due diligence!