Member States may require internet access providers to retain IP addresses in a general and indiscriminate manner to combat criminal offences, provided this retention doesn’t reveal precise details about the private life of the person concerned.
CJEU on access to phone records related to serious crime and clarifies conditions for transmitting and using evidence in criminal cases with a cross-border dimension.
Consent is required to list subscribers' details in publicly available directories. If obtained, including on behalf of other controllers, a data subject can withdraw it (= an erasure request) from any of them, and each controller may need to inform the others.
Breaching GDPR rights doesn't automatically result in non-material damage, and controllers can't (ever?) escape liability simply because someone under their authority didn't follow instructions.
[Updated 24 April with highlighted file + 🎙️] Is the EDPB trying to "rewrite the entire economic model of Big Tech and the adtech industry in the EU"? 🤔 Controversial Opinion just published!
🇩🇰 DPA changes sub-processor third-party beneficiary clause in their SCCs for data processing agreements as per Article 28(8). Agreements signed before this are still valid.
Breaching GDPR rights doesn't automatically result in non-material damage, and controllers can't (ever?) escape liability simply because someone under their authority didn't follow instructions, and an AG Opinion may disrupt DPAs workload. 😬
A key (Directive 95/46/EC) ruling broadly interpreting key definitions (personal and health data, processing) and narrowly applied exceptions, but found that simply putting a website online doesn't necessarily result in transfers.