Breaching GDPR rights doesn't automatically result in non-material damage, and controllers can't (ever?) escape liability simply because someone under their authority didn't follow instructions.
[Updated 24 April with highlighted file + 🎙️] Is the EDPB trying to "rewrite the entire economic model of Big Tech and the adtech industry in the EU"? 🤔 Controversial Opinion just published!
🇩🇰 DPA changes sub-processor third-party beneficiary clause in their SCCs for data processing agreements as per Article 28(8). Agreements signed before this are still valid.
Breaching GDPR rights doesn't automatically result in non-material damage, and controllers can't (ever?) escape liability simply because someone under their authority didn't follow instructions, and an AG Opinion may disrupt DPAs workload. 😬
A key (Directive 95/46/EC) ruling broadly interpreting key definitions (personal and health data, processing) and narrowly applied exceptions, but found that simply putting a website online doesn't necessarily result in transfers.
DPAs can order controllers to delete unlawfully processed data without a prior request from a data subject, and regardless of where the data came from (the data subject or elsewhere).
Orally disclosing personal data = 'processing' and potentially subject to the GDPR, and sharing criminal data orally (or in writing) isn't allowed to fulfill a public access request.
Update 26 Mar 2024: the DPA rejects reopening the cases, upholding that analytics/statistics aren't a necessary part of the alternative to paid access.
[22 March update: Amazon has appealed] The 🇫🇷 CNIL fined Amazon for excessively intrusive monitoring, using several illegal indicators and unsecure video surveillance software, without sufficiently informing employees and visitors.