Two rulings on the concept of personal data, one stating that oral data = processing, and last one pertains to the Europol regulation. DPO Hub writeups coming!
🚨 My final writeup of the EDPB's CEF DPO report, which you shouldn't spend time on unless you have time to spare or are simply burning with curiosity! PS: We just released our Grumpy GDPR episode on this.
31 DPAs (7 are 🇩🇪 state level) participate with the intention to assess how organisations deal with access requests *in practice*. Final report published!
This case is not only a goldmine for DPOs in the Swedish healthcare sector (although particularly so), but DPOs in general, for assessing roles, legal bases and processor liability.
🇸🇪 MedHelp must pay SEK 11,3 million (~$1m) for leaking 2,7 million health-related conversations (of 170 000 hours) online for several years and no legal basis for forwarding call to Thailand.
The CJEU held that not only static IP addresses (ref. Scarlet) are protected personal data under data protection law, but also dynamic ones, and that national laws can't restrict interest which are legitimate under EU law.
In a case on copyright infringement, the CJEU stated that IP addresses are protected personal data because they allow data subjects to be precisely identified.