CJEU C-507/23 Pateretaju tiesibu aizsardzibas centrs (PTAC) 4 Oct 2024
A GDPR breach isn't automatically "damage" under Article 82(1). An apology may compensate for non-material damage if it fully remedies the harm and it's impossible to restore the original situation, but whether you're sorry or not doesn't matter (but maybe it can prevent matters from escalating).
Dec 28, 2024
—
2 min read
You might also like
CJEU C-526/24 Brillen Rottler 19 Mar 2026
members
–
2 min read
If a DSAR is made solely to engineer a compensation claim rather than to verify lawful processing, it can be refused as abusive – even if it's the first request.
CJEU C-413/23 P EDPS v SRB (Concept of personal data) 4 Sep 2025 – Case closed!
members
–
6 min read
Pseudonymised data isn’t always personal in every case to everyone – but measures must be effective. Comments are personal by nature – no need to assess content, purpose or effects. Whether a person can be identified must be assessed from the controller’s perspective, when collecting the data.
CJEU C-604/22 IAB Europe TC String 7 Mar 2024
members
–
6 min read
[9 Jan: DPA must reassess] GDPR definitions are broad: information = personal data if someone can be identified using third-party data. Joint controllership doesn’t automatically cover further processing, but you are one if you set binding rules and jointly decide purposes and means.