CJEU C-313/23 Inspektorat kam Visshia sadeben savet 30 Apr 2025
That a court authorises personal data disclosure to another judicial body qualifies as processing under the GDPR – but it doesn’t make the court a controller or a DPA, and it’s not required to ensure compliance unless an Article 79(1) action is brought before it.
May 6, 2025
—
3 min read
You might also like
CJEU C-710/23 Ministerstvo zdravotnictvi 3 Apr 2025
members
–
3 min read
GDPR still applies when acting on behalf of a legal person. Plus, major implications for 🇨🇿 Czech – and potentially other – public bodies handling FOI requests: you may need to consult data subjects before disclosure, and even if that's impossible, you must still balance FOI with data protection.
CJEU C-654/23 Inteligo Media 27 Mar 2025 AG Opinion
members
–
2 min read
AG Szpunar: If someone creates an online account that includes access to your email newsletters, sending them qualifies as 'direct marketing’ under the ePrivacy Directive Article 13 and is covered by the exception in point 2. Under Article 95 GDPR, a lawful basis under Article 6 isn’t needed.
CJEU GC EUDPR T‑354/22 Bindl v Commission 8 Jan 2025
members
–
2 min read
Latest: The case has been appealed! The CJEU's General Court orders the European Commission to pay €400 in non-material damages for US transfers made in March 2022, when no adequacy decision or alternative safeguard was in place.