CJEU C-199/24 Legal Newsdesk Sweden 4 Sep 2025 AG Opinion
AG Szpunar: National law can’t make defamation the only remedy if criminal conviction data are published online for payment. Publishing conviction records online for payment, without any processing or editing, isn’t processing for journalistic purposes.
Sep 16, 2025
—
3 min read
You might also like
CJEU T-553/23 Latombe v Commission 3 Sep 2025
members
–
3 min read
[Added Rie's point of view – 🇬🇧 version still not available 17 Sep.] "The General Court dismisses the action for annulment" and the EU-US DPF remains valid.
CJEU C-655/23 Quirin Privatbank 4 Sep 2025
members
–
3 min read
GDPR offers no judicial remedy outside erasure requests to stop future unlawful processing, but Member States may. Non-material damage covers negative feelings – if proven. A controller’s fault doesn’t affect compensation, and a court order banning repeat GDPR violations can’t reduce or replace it.
CJEU C-413/23 P EDPS v SRB (Concept of personal data) 4 Sep 2025
members
–
3 min read
CJEU on General Court: 1) ❌ Someone's comment = their personal data, no need to examine further 2) ✅ Pseudonymised data isn’t always personal data for everyone, in every case 3) ❌ Identifiability must be assessed when data is collected and from the controller’s perspective; Deloitte's not relevant.