CJEU C-101/01 Bodil Lindqvist
A key (Directive 95/46/EC) ruling broadly interpreting key definitions (personal and health data, processing) and narrowly applied exceptions, but found that simply putting a website online doesn't necessarily result in transfers.
Apr 9, 2024
—
4 min read
You might also like
CJEU C-169/23 Masdi
members
–
3 min read
UPDATED: First interpretation of the Art. 14(5)(c) derogation! It applies to *all* data not collected from the data subject, including self-generated data. And a DPA can verify national law under Art. 14(5)(c) - but not include Art. 32 obligations under that. And beware of language differences!
CJEU C-17/22 HTB Neunte Immobilien Portfolio
members
–
5 min read
UPDATED: National case-law could be relevant under Article 6(1)(c) legal obligation. And while we get some further guidance on legitimate interest assessments, the CJEU creates some confusion around 'strictly necessary' again.
CJEU C-21/23 Lindenapotheke 4 Oct 2024
members
–
5 min read
UPDATED: Competitors can take legal action against your GDPR violations if considered an illegal unfair commercial practice. And 'special category personal data' threshold is now lower—ordering pharmacy-only medicinal products online is considered sharing health data, requiring explicit consent.